The reaction to the London bombings has been markedly different to the reaction after 9/11 in the US from a lot of perspectives. Granted the two incidents don’t measure up when you measure body count, but you can draw up some comparisons between the two because the terrorizing effect it has had on the populace is largely the same. Here are some of my observations:
1. The Muslim community under the banner of Muslim Council of Britain has been very vocal and unanimous in condemning the blasts. Under the leadership of Sir Iqbal Sacranie, they have come together on a united platform to speak out against the deplorable events of 7/7.
A joint statement of condemnation came as 22 leaders and scholars met at the Islamic Cultural Centre, in London. [Article]
What’s more impressive than the unanimous statement is the fact that it has received great media attention.
In contrast to this, the response to 9/11 by Islamic leaders in the US was slow in coming and there was no single decisive statement delivered to the world wide audience. This is not to say that clerics and scholars based in the US did not condemn 9/11. It’s just that they didn’t do it in the same public and unequivocal fashion as their British counterparts.
2. The response by the Blair government has been much more acceptable than the knee-jerk reaction of the Bush government (in response to their respective “9/11”s). Compared to the belligerent ‘smoke-em-out’ attitude of the US in the aftermath to 9/11, the British response has been more tempered and logical.
Here are two quotes:
“We must be clear about how we win this struggle. We should take what security measures we can. But let us not kid ourselves. In the end, it is by the power of argument, debate, true religious faith and true legitimate politics that we will defeat this threat. ” [Source]
“Those who make war against the United States have chosen their own destruction.” [Source]
I’ll leave it to you to figure out who said what. Now I’m no big fan of Blair, but it seems that at least outwardly he has been saying the right things.
3. The response of the media to the incidents were also different. After 9/11 it seemed that all the American channels were playing to the same tune and there was no worthwhile questioning or introspection. It was not uncommon to see the same series of ‘themes’ plastered across each news channel. Sometimes I wondered how they all managed to get even the same catchy phrases (‘American Under Attack’, ‘America Responds’ etc.).
In contrast to this, the British media has given adequate coverage to all aspects of the bombings. From reporting the actual incident to giving coverage to the MCB’s condemnation of the blasts, the BBC has done a reasonable job. Also, the sense of perspective has not been lost. Today, barely a week after the blasts, the top story on the BBC website is not some rehash of the 7/7 outrage. Yes, the headline does mention over 70 people being killed. But they’re not talking about London, they’re speaking of Iraq .
I do hope the Brits use the lessons learned from this horrific day to their advantage. In the best case scenario, the authorities would understand why more and more British youth are getting alienated and driven to these extremes and do something to ameliorate the situation, the government would move beyond talk and try to tackle this menace from all angles (including making some difficult foreign policy decisions) and, foremost, the Muslim community will be successful in convincing the public that these acts were antithetical to Islam and educate it’s youth to the true teachings of the religion.